Search Blog
Blogroll
  • Alan Fustey
  • Becky Wong
  • Bert Griffin
  • Blair MacDougall
  • Blake Goldring
  • Brett Baughman
  • Camillo Lento
  • Chris Delaney
  • Cynthia Kett
  • Darren Long
  • Desmond Jordan
  • Don Shaughnessy
  • Doug Lamb
  • Ed Olkovich
  • Eva Sachs
  • Evelyn Jacks
  • Gail Bebee
  • Gerald Trites
  • Gordon Brock
  • Guy Conger
  • Guy Ward
  • Heather Phillips
  • Ian Burns
  • Ian R. Whiting
  • Ian Telfer
  • Jack Comeau
  • James Dean
  • James West
  • Jeffrey Lipton Fairmont Gloucester
  • Jim Ruta
  • Jim Yih
  • Joe White
  • Jonathan Chevreau
  • Kenneth Eng
  • Larry Weltman
  • Malvin Spooner
  • Mark Borkowski
  • Marty Gunderson
  • Michael Kavanagh
  • Monty Loree
  • Nick Papapanos
  • Norma Walton
  • Pat Bolland
  • Patrick O’Meara
  • Paul Brent
  • Peter Deeb
  • Peter Lantos
  • Riaz Mamdani
  • Richard Crenian
  • Richard Warke
  • Rick Atkinson
  • Rob Peers
  • Robert Bird
  • Robert Gignac
  • Sam Albanese
  • Stephane Ruah
  • Steve Nyvik
  • Steve Selengut
  • Tammy Johnston
  • Terry Cutler
  • Trade With Kavan
  • Trevor Parry
  • Trindent Consulting
  • Wayne Wile
  • Categories
    November 2012
    M T W T F S S
    « Oct   Dec »
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    2627282930  

    Tags

    The Real Inflation Question

    Guy Conger

    The question isn’t whether or not we are going to have inflation the question is which kind.
    inflation is imminent. The only argument that can be made is whether it will be stagflation, higher
    inflation or rampant inflation. All of these scenarios are still in play. Does the global economy
    continue to contract potentially leading to stagflation? Does the global/U.S. economy begin to grow
    a little quicker leading to higher than normal, single digit inflation, or do we experience a global,
    high growth/high employment recovery that leads to rampant, double digit inflation?
    I think this is the most probable outcome. Rising inflation will be slow at first and then turn up sharply.

    Stagflation is still very possible in the U.S. The Federal Reserve continues to increase money supply
    in an effort to avoid the most damaging economic scenario. As they continue their attempt to stave
    off stagflation they could be creating a high single digit inflation problem or even worse a double
    digit 1970’s disaster. It is my belief that the Fed would welcome mid-single digit inflation. An even
    weaker U.S. dollar would help the current trend of re-sourcing that is taking hold in the U.S.
    manufacturing sector. Companies have begun to bring back manufacturing to the U.S. as it has
    become more expensive to produce products in overseas. Higher inflation would benefit homeowners
    that are upside down in their mortgages, creating additional jobs and GDP growth. Mid-single digit
    inflation would also be a welcome contributor to our ability to pay down some of the $16 trillion
    debt load by using cheaper currency. What the Fed would like to avoid is rampant inflation.
    The Federal Reserve has artificially kept interest rates low. This is similar to not allowing steam
    out of a locomotive engine. The steam would build up and eventually the pressure would cause it to
    explode. The U.S. economy is no different. By artificially keeping interest rates low through buy
    side liquidity that will eventually fade away, the Federal Reserve is creating a bubble. As soon as
    the Federal Reserve stops supplying liquidity on the buy side the fixed income markets have
    nowhere to go but down, potentially reversing a 31 year bull market.
    I don’t believe stagflation will be the end result of the Federal Reserve’s monetary policies.
    Instead, I’m confident that higher inflation and quite possibly rampant, double digit inflation is
    likely. I’m a firm believer that economic growth and full employment (4% or less
    unemployment) is probable.

    The MONEY® Network