Search Blog
  • Alan Fustey
  • Becky Wong
  • Bert Griffin
  • Blair MacDougall
  • Blake Goldring
  • Brett Baughman
  • Camillo Lento
  • Chris Delaney
  • Cynthia Kett
  • Darren Long
  • Desmond Jordan
  • Don Shaughnessy
  • Doug Lamb
  • Ed Olkovich
  • Eva Sachs
  • Evelyn Jacks
  • Gail Bebee
  • Gerald Trites
  • Gordon Brock
  • Guy Conger
  • Guy Ward
  • Heather Phillips
  • Ian Burns
  • Ian R. Whiting
  • Ian Telfer
  • Jack Comeau
  • James Dean
  • James West
  • Jeffrey Lipton Fairmont Gloucester
  • Jim Ruta
  • Jim Yih
  • Joe White
  • Jonathan Chevreau
  • Kenneth Eng
  • Larry Weltman
  • Malvin Spooner
  • Mark Borkowski
  • Marty Gunderson
  • Michael Kavanagh
  • Monty Loree
  • Nick Papapanos
  • Norma Walton
  • Pat Bolland
  • Patrick O’Meara
  • Paul Brent
  • Peter Deeb
  • Peter Lantos
  • Riaz Mamdani
  • Richard Crenian
  • Richard Warke
  • Rick Atkinson
  • Rob Peers
  • Robert Bird
  • Robert Gignac
  • Sam Albanese
  • Stephane Ruah
  • Steve Nyvik
  • Steve Selengut
  • Tammy Johnston
  • Terry Cutler
  • Trade With Kavan
  • Trevor Parry
  • Trindent Consulting
  • Wayne Wile
  • Categories
    April 2013
    M T W T F S S
    « Mar   May »


    Education and Tuition Claims at Tax Time

    Ian Whiting

    I am right in the middle of the annual early season tax rush and many of the early filers expect refunds. I always get a few new clients each year as referrals from existing clients and it is always interesting to see previous returns they have either done themselves or have paid someone else to complete.

    One area of particular interest is the claim for various tuition and education expenses. In most instances, I see that previous filers have almost universally transferred the claim from a dependent child to one of the parents. Of course this is permitted but my question is why would someone do this without at least explaining the consequences of making that choice. After questioning these clients, no-one has ever explained their options – or their child’s options!

    While I find this strange, I guess it is the easy way out for many preparers – they don’t have to take time and run things both ways and the explain to their clients. I don’t see it that way at all.

    When I explain the potential short-term advantage to the parent in question versus the potential long-term benefit to their child, they have always opted to change the filing and leave the unclaimed tuition and education items in the hands of their children.

    So – what do I show them? All of these expenses involve post-secondary education and the intention is that the child will pursue some level of advanced career placement with the potential to earn above-average income, which is great to see. Wouldn’t it be nice for them to have the luxury of choosing when to claim those accumulated expenses after they begin working? Wouldn’t it be nice for them to maybe have an entire year of employment income – and pay ZERO taxes on it? Would that help reduce or maybe even eliminate debts that had accumulated during their education – including Student Loans?

    Something worth considering before you rush to file your return – the potential tax savings in the hands of the student are major considerations versus the potential for some short-term savings in the hands of an employed parent. Don’t choose the easy way out – do the numbers first.

    The MONEY® Network