News
Screenshot of X discussion with Tobi Lutke + Shopify CEO Tobi Lutke Screenshot | X + Kevin Dietsch | Getty Images

Shopify CEO says pensioners are ‘dependents’ who shouldn’t vote — then backed a plan that gives $500K earners 5 votes

On Sunday, Shopify co-founder and CEO Tobi Lütke used his personal X account to endorse a plan that would strip millions of Canadians of a full vote — with a focus on removing a democratic tool from anyone who doesn’t pay income tax (1). In a separate exchange, he argued that Canadians living on a locked-in pension should lose their vote entirely, comparing retirees to legal dependents.

Lütke posts drew immediate, heated reaction online. But before Canadian retirees start worrying about whether a Canada Pension Plan (CPP) cheque affects their ballot, it helps to separate one executive’s personal opinion from Canada’s actual constitutional law

Advertisement

Here is what was actually said, what the Charter actually protects and why millions of retirees and pension holders have nothing to fear at the ballot box.

The best of Money.ca delivered weekly.

By signing up, you accept Money.ca Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What Shopify CEO Lütke actually proposed

The exchange started when a reply to one of Lütke’s posts floated a tiered voting system tied to income tax paid: $0 in tax means 0 votes, $1 to $100,000 in taxable earnings means 1 vote, $100,000 to C$200,000 means 2 votes and so on, capped at 5 votes for anyone paying tax on $500,000 or more. Lütke replied with two words: ‘Good system’.

Separately, Lütke argued that once a person’s pension is locked in and guaranteed, that person becomes a dependent in the same category as a minor and should no longer be entitled to a vote. He has weighed in on political and cultural debates on his personal account before, including defending Shopify’s decision to keep hosting Breitbart’s online store in 2017.

Must Read

Join 19,000+ readers and get Money.ca’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Why a pension can’t cost you your vote in Canada

The idea makes for a viral post, but it runs directly into section 3 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part of the Constitution Act, 1982. Section 3 guarantees every citizen of Canada the right to vote in a federal or provincial election.

That right is unusually well protected. Section 3 is one of the few Charter provisions that Parliament and provincial legislatures cannot override using the notwithstanding clause — the tool governments have used in recent years to pass legislation despite Charter concerns. Tying voting rights to income, taxes paid, or pension status would mean reopening the Constitution itself, not passing an ordinary law.

Get your money working for you. Every dollar you save on fees is a dollar that stays invested and working toward your future. Whether you're building a TFSA, growing your RRSP or investing in a non-registered account, the right brokerage can help you keep more of your returns. Find the ideal discount brokerage account

How many Canadians this would actually touch

This isn’t an abstract debate. An estimated 6.4 million Canadians were receiving a CPP retirement benefit in 2025, a figure the Chief Actuary of Canada expects to grow to 9.5 million by 2050 as the population ages. Separately, more than 7.2 million Canadians were active members of an employer-registered pension plan in 2023, including 4.9 million in defined benefit plans — the type of pension most often described as locked in and guaranteed.

In other words, any proposal to tie voting rights to pension status would touch a large and fast-growing share of Canadians — precisely the retirees and near-retirees who rely most on predictable, guaranteed income.

Executives weighing in on hot-button political ideas on social media is nothing new, and Lütke has done it for years. What’s different here is the direct implication for retirement income — the idea that collecting a pension could somehow disqualify a Canadian from voting. It can’t, and changing that would take far more than a viral post or even an ordinary act of Parliament. For now, the only thing at stake for Canadian retirees is a headline, not a ballot.

You May Also Like

The most expensive financial mistakes are often the ones you don't see coming. Join 19,000+ Canadians who get the money moves, risks and opportunities shaping their finances — delivered free each week. Subscribe now.

Share this:
Romana King Senior Editor

Romana King, Senior Editor at Money.ca, also writes for various North American publications and the RKHomeowner blog. Her book, House Poor No More, is an Amazon bestseller and five-time award winner, including the 2022 New York CPA Society's Excellence in Financial Journalism (EFJ) Book Award.

more from Romana King

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Money.ca is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.