AAPL -0.93%
AMD -0.11%
AMZN +0.29%
ARKK -0.17%
AVGO +0.60%
AXP -2.27%
BEP -1.88%
BLK -1.18%
BRK.A -0.52%
BRK.B -0.49%
CGAU +3.43%
DASH +0.19%
FDX -0.20%
GOOG -0.99%
HD +0.06%
ISRG -5.91%
KO -0.05%
LCID +0.00%
LYFT +0.34%
MSFT -0.50%
NFLX +0.09%
NVDA -0.16%
PLTR -0.46%
PYPL -0.16%
QCOM -0.51%
SNAP -0.57%
UBER +0.94%
UPS -0.14%
VOO -0.69%
Taxes
Team Canada and former Maple Leaf John Tavares FABRICE COFFRINI | Getty Images

Former Leaf John Tavares paid 15% tax on his $15.25M signing bonus. The CRA says he owes more than 50% — now a judge decides. Is that fair?

Star NHL forward John Tavares, known for his forthright leadership and legacy-defining 500-plus career goal scorecard, has entered another high-stakes venue this week — the courtroom.

Back in 2018, the NHL player signed a staggering $77 million, 7-year contract, which included a $15 million signing bonus to make the switch from the New York Islanders to his hometown team of the Toronto Maple Leafs. At the time, the deal was lauded as proof of a Canadian team’s ability to attract serious talent and a metaphorical homecoming of a prodigal talent.

Advertisement

In the years since, the deal has unfortunately soured for Tavares as its tax implications became more clear, which has culminated in an appeal to a seven-figure Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) tax bill and a subsequent court case.

The best of Money.ca delivered weekly.

By signing up, you accept Money.ca Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What the CRA had to say about the deal

When Tavares received and accepted the offer initially, he was still living in New York and paid a 15% tax on the signing bonus to the U.S, which both he and the team considered the payment an inducement.

However, in 2022, the CRA reassessed his tax filing and claimed that he owed an additional $6.85 million in tax, as well as $1.2 million in interest. That would effectively equal nearly half of his signing bonus being owed in taxes.

The steep reassessment was based on the agency concluding the bonus is more akin to a regular salary due to how it would be paid out over multiple years alongside other specific provisions.

Traditionally, according to the CRA, a bonus is fully taxable in the year an employee receives it (or is entitled to receive it), just like a regular salary. It’s then added to any other employment income and taxed at a person’s marginal rate — there’s no special lower “bonus tax rate” that permanently applies. Any perception of a higher bonus tax rate usually comes from how withholding is calculated, not the actual tax owed.

Employers typically use the CRA’s bonus method to calculate how much tax to withhold from a bonus, rather than the regular periodic method. Since the bonus is added on top of regular income for this calculation, it often pushes withholding into a higher marginal bracket for that calculation — which is why bonus paycheques can look heavily taxed. This is just withholding, though; it reconciles when a person files their return. If too much was withheld, they will get it back as a refund; if too little, they will owe the difference.

In Tavares’ case, the 15% paid initially was deemed insufficient by the CRA, which is why he is expected to pay more for what he earned.

Must Read

Join 19,000+ readers and get Money.ca’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Tavares’s defence

During his August 18 court date, Tavares chronicled the initial negotiation involved in his eventual signing, stating how, at the time, he was approached by several teams once his contract with the Islanders was up.

Advertisement

At the time, Tavares’s one non-negotiable was the contract’s annual average value, which he argued should not be lower than $11 million per year, while also wanting the signing bonus folded into that figure so the payment could be protected from tax in ways regular employment income isn’t.

“Much of that is in a signing bonus, so it can’t be bought out, and it’s protected during a lockout,” Tavares told reporters outside the courtroom.

It was especially important that his earnings be shielded from any industry and life disruptions, which eventually occurred in the form of a pandemic, an NHL lockout and a major injury he sustained throughout the subsequent years since signing.

“The importance of protecting the value of the earnings of that contract was really important to me,” Tavares explained.

“I just hope to prove what the contract was all about and the intentions in signing it and everything that went into it. So, overall, you just hope everything you know can work out in my favour.“

You May Also Like

The most expensive financial mistakes are often the ones you don't see coming. Join 19,000+ Canadians who get the money moves, risks and opportunities shaping their finances — delivered free each week. Subscribe now.

Share this:
David Saric Associate editor

Writer and editor based in Toronto with experience in personal finance, insurance, arts and culture and branded content.

more from David Saric

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Money.ca is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.