Employment
Reduced work week DC Studio | Shutterstock

Imagine losing 20% of your pay overnight — that's the risk of a 32-hour workweek, experts warn

A 32-hour workweek sounds like a straightforward win: Fewer hours, same paycheque. But if a version of that idea ever moved beyond talking points in Canada, experts say the model most likely to spread wouldn’t guarantee that at all.

The catalyst behind the renewed debate is a U.S. bill. The Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act, reintroduced this month by U.S. Rep. Mark Takano and U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders, would require employers to pay for a 32-hour week, then time-and-a-half for anything worked beyond that, with no cut to pay or benefits. Sanders has framed it as a way to make sure gains from artificial intelligence (AI) and automation reach workers, not just executives and shareholders.

Advertisement

There’s no Canadian equivalent on the table right now, so this is a hypothetical for Canadian workers, not a policy shift. But the conversation is worth having here too: A four-day workweek is already gaining traction among some Canadian employers, and it’s easy to lump that trend in with the U.S. bill. They are not the same thing — and the difference matters for your paycheque.

The best of Money.ca delivered weekly.

By signing up, you accept Money.ca Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

What’s actually being proposed?

The U.S. bill pays workers for 32 hours, then requires authorized, paid overtime for anything more. Nita Chhinzer, an associate professor of management at the University of Guelph, told CTV News that structure is being sold as a guarantee of no lost pay or benefits, but in practice would likely depend on employers authorizing that extra paid time.

Must Read

Join 19,000+ readers and get Money.ca’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

Reduced hours versus a compressed schedule

Chhinzer draws a distinction that’s easy to miss in the headlines. A four-day compressed workweek — the kind gaining ground in Canadian workplaces — typically packs the same total hours into fewer days, so pay doesn’t change. A genuine reduced workweek, like the U.S. bill, cuts total scheduled hours, which only avoids a pay cut if extra hours are consistently authorized and paid.

Why the promise gets complicated for hourly workers

A salaried employee’s paycheque doesn’t move with the clock, so a shorter week may cost them little. An hourly worker is paid for hours actually worked, so fewer scheduled hours without guaranteed overtime is a direct hit to take-home pay. According to Chhinzer, “the average person cannot withstand a 20% income decline” if extra hours aren’t guaranteed, pointing to how little room current affordability pressures leave for that kind of drop.

Let’s assume an hourly worker earning $25 an hour for a 40-hour week takes home $1,000 before deductions. Move to a 32-hour week with no guaranteed overtime, and that weekly pay drops to $800 — a 20% cut, even though the hourly rate never changed.

What it would take to work here

Sarah McVanel, chief recognition officer at HR firm Greatness Magnified, told CTV News that a reduced workweek only works if employers rethink role expectations, cut down on unnecessary meetings and use technology, including AI, to hold onto efficiency rather than pile the same workload onto fewer hours. She also said many workers stay skeptical that a shorter week is truly on the table, even after employers raise it.

What to ask before you count on a shorter week

Before assuming a shorter week means the same paycheque, it helps to get specific answers:

  • Is this a compressed schedule — same hours packed into fewer days — or an actual reduction in total hours
  • If hours drop, is overtime pre-authorized and guaranteed, or left to a manager’s discretion
  • Is pay structured hourly or salaried, and does that change under the new schedule
  • What happens to benefits, vacation accrual or pension contributions that are tied to hours worked

For now, the 32-hour workweek is an American proposal with no Canadian equivilent in front of any legislature. But as the four-day workweek conversation keeps building here, the label matters as much as the hours. Shorter and same paycheque aren’t automatically the same promise — before getting excited about either one, find out which one is actually being offered.

You May Also Like

The most expensive financial mistakes are often the ones you don't see coming. Join 19,000+ Canadians who get the money moves, risks and opportunities shaping their finances — delivered free each week. Subscribe now.

Share this:
Amy Tokic Associate Editor

Amy Tokic is an SEO content editor for Money.ca. She holds a B.A. in Communications from the University of Windsor. Amy is an award-winning author and has been writing professionally for 15 years, publishing articles in the lifestyle and health sectors.

more from Amy Tokic

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Money.ca is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.