Follow us on Google for more Money.ca news
Add us on GooglePretty privilege may be alive and well — and apparently so is skinny privilege.
For years, economists have documented what’s known as the “obesity penalty” — the social and financial disadvantages people can face because of their weight. Now, the rapid rise of GLP-1 medications is giving researchers a new way to measure just how much appearance may shape a person’s economic prospects — and the numbers suggest the bias runs deep in Canada, too.
An estimated 3 million Canadian adults are currently taking a GLP-1 drug such as Ozempic, Wegovy or Mounjaro to manage diabetes or control weight, making Canada the second-highest user of the medications globally, according to the Canadian Public Health Association. Roughly 1 in 3 Canadian adults now live with obesity, a share that continues to climb.
Thanks for subscribing!
The best of Money.ca delivered weekly.
By signing up, you accept Money.ca Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.
Against that backdrop, a 2026 working paper from the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), a U.S. non-profit economic research organization, is raising new questions about how weight shapes women’s careers. Harvard economist Rebecca Diamond found that American women who were unemployed when they began taking GLP-1 medications saw a dramatic change in their prospects 18 months later.
Their employment rate rose by nearly 27 percentage points compared with women who wanted to take the medications but had not yet started. For context, Statistics Canada data show the employment-rate gap between Canadian women with only a high school diploma and those with a university degree is about 12.8 percentage points — smaller than the jump Diamond found among American women after they started GLP-1s.
The research does not suggest that losing weight made these women smarter, more capable or better qualified for work. Instead, it raises questions about whether changes in appearance affect how women are perceived by employers.
The financial cost of weight bias in Canada
Long before GLP-1s entered the cultural conversation, Canadian research already showed that weight was shaping women’s place in the workforce.
Women with obesity are 5.3% less likely to be employed than women at a healthy weight; for men, that gap is just 0.3%, according to a 2025 study by BMC Public Health. Nationally, that employment disparity costs Canada an estimated $8.2 billion a year in lost wages. Even when they are employed, women with obesity earn about 4% less annually than their healthy-weight peers, or roughly $1,461 less a year on average. Nationally, that pay gap adds up to nearly $3.8 billion in lost income.
A peer-reviewed study in the Canadian Journal of Public Health, using Canadian population health survey data, found that obesity decreases Canadian women’s probability of employment by about 25 percentage points. The study’s authors state this is comparable to the labour-market impact of a mental health condition or substance-use issue. The authors argue the findings support updating Canadian labour law to explicitly prohibit hiring discrimination based on body weight.
That gap matters because, as it stands, weight is not a protected ground under human rights law anywhere in Canada. Workers who believe they’ve faced weight-based discrimination generally have to argue their case under existing protections, such as disability or sex discrimination, and human rights tribunals have been inconsistent about whether obesity qualifies.
Make your cash work harder. You can't control inflation, rates or market swings — but you can control where your cash sits. Compare high-interest savings accounts to keep your money working for you. Find the right HISA account
What the data shows
Diamond’s paper looked at survey data from about 15,000 people in the U.S., comparing women who started taking GLP-1 medications with similar women who wanted to take them but had not yet started. The groups were matched on factors including income, race, body mass index and overall health.
The study also found changes in women’s personal lives. Single women taking GLP-1s were nearly 29 percentage points more likely to get married or move in with a partner than similar women who had not started the medications.
In Canada, the toll of weight bias shows up a little differently — not just in hiring, but in absenteeism, disability claims and early retirement. Women with obesity report significantly more sick days than men with obesity, and workers with more severe obesity are more likely to leave the workforce early.
None of this shows that body size determines someone’s value or ability. Rather, it suggests weight-related bias has been showing up in women’s employment and pay for years, long before GLP-1 medications became popular.
When pretty privilege pays
Codie Sanchez, CEO and founder of Contrarian Thinking, has said women who wear makeup to work earn about 30% more, on average, than women who don’t.
“Pretty privilege is very real,” she said on an episode of The Burnouts Podcast. Sanchez has argued that even though the advantage is unfair, women should use it rather than ignore it.
Diamond’s findings suggest weight bias may work the same way. Women who were already employed when they began taking GLP-1s did not see higher pay or better odds of promotion — the biggest gains appeared among women who were unemployed and trying to enter the workforce.
The underlying reality hasn't changed — these women aren't more skilled or more productive than before. What's changed is how they're perceived. If some women receive more opportunities after losing weight, that gain may say more about how appearance shapes perception than about the women themselves.
You May Also Like
- This 7-step plan from Dave Ramsey is designed to help you ditch debt, save more and build wealth — here’s how it works
- Prioritize these 4 critical investments and watch your net worth skyrocket
- Here are 8 solid money moves that could free up real cash every month — here's where to start
- Millionaires under 43 are reshaping investing — just 25% of their portfolios are in stocks. Here’s where their money is going
The most expensive financial mistakes are often the ones you don't see coming. Join 19,000+ Canadians who get the money moves, risks and opportunities shaping their finances — delivered free each week. Subscribe now.
Victoria Vesovski is a Toronto-based staff reporter at Moneywise covering personal finance, lifestyle and trending news. She holds degrees from the University of Toronto and New York University, and her work has appeared on platforms including Yahoo Finance, MSN Money and Apple News.
