Economy
Image of a the U.S. Department of Commerce site | Justin Wolfers laughing during live CBC interview | President Donald Trump @JustinWolfers | X.com and Tada Images + lev redin | Shutterstock
Trending

33,736 views this week

Economist bursts into laughter when asked about Trump's failed tariffs — sadly data reinforces that Canadians are paying the price

It’s been a year of tariffs, U.S. trade threats, record deficits and rising prices. Now, a leading economist has set the tone when it comes to reactions to the latest U.S. trade data. And it wasn’t outrage — it was laughter.

During a recent interview with CBC, Justin Wolfers, a leading economist and Professor of Economics and Public Policy at the University of Michigan, burst out laughing on live television (1). It was an unscripted (and unusual) response to a question about the newly released 2025 U.S. trade data from the Commerce Department.

Advertisement

CBC HOST: The Commerce Department just released data showing the U.S. trade deficit in goods hit a record high in 2025, even after a year of aggressive tariffs from the Trump administration. Justin Wolfers, as an economist, what's your reaction?

WOLFERS: [laughs] Hahahahahahahahahahaha ... hahahahahahahaha ... hahahahahahahahahaha ... oh, wow.

And it was during those few seconds of audible disbelief that Wolfers composed himself and offered what may be the most efficient economic summary of the year: A Ph.D. isn’t required to reach a conclusion.

“If the trade deficit this year is bigger than it was last year, and this year we have high tariffs in a trade war, and last year we didn't, I guess it doesn't require a lot of fancy statistics to infer that Trump's tariffs didn't help the trade deficit.”

What the U.S. data shows — and tells

The new data, released February 19, 2026 by the U.S. Commerce Department, confirmed what most economists had been predicting since day one: Trump's trade war did not shrink the U.S. trade deficit. In fact, the U.S. goods trade deficit hit a record US$1.24 trillion (C$1.37 trillion) in 2025 — a 2% increase from the prior year — even as sweeping double-digit tariffs were applied to imports from Canada, Mexico, China and dozens of other trading partners.

As a result, the overall U.S. trade deficit (goods and services combined) came in at US$901 billion (C$1.23 trillion)— the third-highest on record — barely moving away from the 2024 trade deficit of US$904 billion (C$1.24 trillion).

The U.S. trade tariffs were criticized from the start

As one of the most widely cited voices on trade policy in North America, Wolfers boldly criticized Trump’s tariffs right from the start.

In March 2025, he told MSNBC there is 'not an economist alive' who would defend the Trump administration's approach to tariffs (2).

Almost a year later — and with the recent release of federal trade deficit data — Wolfers’s statement continues to reflect poorly on the White House and for everyone who believed in Trump’s tariff approach.

Rather than course-correct, U.S administration suggests censoring analysts

In response to the release of the federal data, the top economic adviser for the Trump administration, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, called for Federal Reserve researchers to be 'disciplined' after they published findings showing 90% of the tariff burden is being absorbed by U.S. businesses and consumers — not by foreign exporters (3).

Advertisement

Wolfers publicly criticized Hassett’s reaction, calling it an attempt to suppress inconvenient economic truth (4). He wasn’t the only economist to speak out. According to Steve Benen (5), a producer for the Rachel Maddow Show and editor of MaddowBlog:

“Paul Krugman released a related video on the subject (6), making a compelling case that Hassett’s call to discipline economists was “thuggish.” Krugman added, “That’s incredible. That’s like saying, ‘If you carefully study the data and come up with results that we in the Trump administration don’t like, we will punish you personally — or we will try to.”

Must Read

Impact of someone else’s trade war on Canadians

Even though Canada didn't launch this trade war, the sad fact is Canadians are paying for it.

Statistics Canada data released the same week as U.S. data showed Canada's own trade deficit widened to C$31.3 billion in 2025 — the largest annual shortfall on record outside of the COVID-19 pandemic (7).

Canadian exports to the U.S. fell 5.8% over the year as American tariffs took their toll on sectors that employ hundreds of thousands of Canadians, including auto manufacturing, energy, agriculture, lumber and steel.

At the same time, Canadian retaliatory tariffs — applied to billions of dollars' worth of American goods — pushed up prices on imported products that Canadians rely on daily, such as food, appliances, furniture and consumer electronics.

Advertisement

The result is a cost-of-living squeeze from both directions.

Canadians in export industries faced job insecurity and reduced hours. Canadians at the grocery store and the hardware store faced higher prices. And provinces, including British Columbia, are already projecting record deficits — in part because of the revenue disruption caused by U.S. trade policy.

A course-correction is coming, but not from Trump’s administration

On February 20, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Trump's emergency tariff powers in a six to three ruling, finding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the president to impose tariffs unilaterally (8).

The court ruled that Congress — not the executive branch — holds the constitutional authority to set tariff policy.

For Canadians, this ruling is meaningful — but it does not automatically undo the economic damage of 2025. Existing tariffs remain in place pending legislative or executive action. Canadian exporters still face uncertainty about what trade rules will look like in six months. And the record deficits on both sides of the border cannot be reversed by a court decision.

Read more: The ultra-rich are bailing on volatile stocks right now — these 4 shockproof assets are their new safe havens

What Canadians can do, right now

The trade war has made one thing clear: Canadians cannot assume that economic policy south of the border will stabilize quickly or protect Canadian interests. That means taking concrete steps to reduce exposure and build resilience.

Stress-test and prepare

If your household income is tied to an export-heavy industry — auto parts, agriculture, energy, forestry or manufacturing — this is the moment to stress-test your budget. Consider scenarios where your employer faces continued tariff pressure or contract uncertainty and how this will impact your household. Then consider steps to prepare. If possible, boost emergency funds, reduce discretionary spending and educate yourself on Employment Insurance (EI) eligibility.

Cut discretionary spending and look for ways to save on essentials

For consumers, the price pressures created by reciprocal tariffs on U.S. goods are unlikely to disappear overnight. Shopping domestically, sourcing Canadian-made alternatives where possible and locking in prices on big-ticket purchases before further volatility can all help stretch household budgets.

Small business owners: Seek help

For small business owners who import U.S. goods or export to American customers, the Supreme Court ruling creates a window — but not certainty. Consulting with a trade lawyer or a financial adviser about contract language, currency hedging and supply chain diversification is now a standard business precaution, not an optional one.

Bottom line

For Canadians watching this play out, the takeaway is simple: The economists flagged it, the numbers confirmed it — and now households have to navigate the fallout. Trade policy has real consequences for real wallets, but most Canadians — and Americans — don’t control the political theatre. What you can control are your own decisions. Stay informed. Adjust your plans. Build in buffers where you can. And if a respected economist like Wolfers can laugh at the absurdity of it all, maybe that’s a reminder that perspective — and a steady hand — still matter most.

Article sources

We rely only on vetted sources and credible third-party reporting. For details, see our editorial ethics and guidelines.

CBC (1); MSNBC (2); BBC (3); MS Now (4, 5); YouTube: @PKrugman (6); Bloomberg (7); Politico (8)

You May Also Like

Share this:
Romana King Senior Editor

Romana King is the Senior Editor at Money.ca. She writes for various publications, and her book -- House Poor No More: 9 Steps That Grow the Value of Your Home and Net Worth -- continues to be an Amazon bestseller. Since its publication in November 2021, this book has won five awards, including the New York CPA Society's Excellence in Financial Journalism (EFJ) Book Award in 2022.

more from Romana King

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Money.ca is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.