AAPL +0.28%
AMD +0.22%
AMZN +1.24%
ARKK -0.74%
AVGO -2.94%
AXP +0.06%
BEP -0.49%
BND +0.41%
BRK.A +1.50%
BTC +2.30%
CGAU -1.22%
DASH +3.60%
DIA +0.33%
FDX +2.90%
GLD +0.10%
HD +0.08%
ISRG -1.35%
LCID -7.89%
LYFT +1.60%
MSFT +0.85%
NFLX +1.85%
NVDA -0.68%
PLTR -2.10%
PYPL +0.08%
QCOM -0.77%
QQQ -0.43%
SNAP +6.53%
SPY -0.04%
UBER +1.36%
UPS +2.90%
VOO -0.02%
Investing News
Moderna needle and President Donald Trump SOPA Images | Getty Images Win McNamee | Getty Images

Trump's US$65,000 Moderna trade is untouchable by law — a Canadian minister would need a blind trust for that

Moderna’s stock surged last week — up nearly 177% at US$174.38 per share as of August 19. The share price spike was triggered after drug firms Moderna (NASDAQ: MRNA) and Merck (NYSE: MRK) announced that a personalized mRNA cancer therapy had succeeded in a major clinical trial. Many investors benefited from the announcement, but probably the most recognizable name was U.S. President Donald Trump.

President Trump’s investment accounts purchased Moderna shares in March 2026. By mid-August market close, those shares were worth more than 225% above what he paid for them, according to financial data platform Quiver Quantitative.

Advertisement

The exact dollar gain isn’t public; however, U.S. disclosure rules require officials to report the purchase range for all publicly traded investments. As a result, official documentation shows a Moderna equity purchase by Trump on March 2 in the range of US$15,000 to US$50,000. A second purchase was recorded March 17, the range of US$1,001 and US$15,000.

The best of Money.ca delivered weekly.

By signing up, you accept Money.ca Terms of Use, Subscription Agreement, and Privacy Policy.

Based on a rough calculation, a 225% gain would turn the low end of those combined purchases (about US$16K) into more than US$52,000. On the high end, a US$65K purchase would’ve turned into US$211,000. It’s a paper profit of somewhere between US$36,000 and US$146,000.

To be clear, nothing President Trump did is considered illegal. Merck and Moderna’s announcement was public, and that triggered the equity price surge. However, this situation does highlight a structural difference between Canada and the U.S.

In America, Trump is legally free to hold and trade individual stocks, like Moderna, all while sitting in office.

In Canada, cabinet ministers, Prime Ministers and elected officials in equivalent positions of power generally must give up their investment holdings, or place their accounts in a blind trust. The core reason is conflict of interest: someone who can influence government policy shouldn’t be able to make investment decisions based on — or profit personally from — decisions they help make.

The rule that makes this legal

In America, the main conflict-of-interest statute — 18 U.S.C. Section 208 — barring federal officials from acting on matters tied to their own financial holdings explicitly exempts the president and vice-president.

According to documentation, Congress carved out that exemption because the president’s responsibilities touch too many industries and interests to realistically require recusal from all of them.

Under current U.S. law, presidents are not required to place their holdings in a blind trust or divest them. Almost a decade ago, a bill that would have imposed exactly that requirement, the Presidential Conflicts of Interest Act, was introduced in Congress but never passed.

That doesn’t mean U.S. president and other senior officials don’t have to follow rules. Insider-trading is still illegal, and each elected official must disclose their holdings and trades, in accordance with the STOCK Act.

Advertisement

The STOCK Act requires covered officials, including the president, to publicly report securities transactions over $1,000 within 45 days. However, the disclosure allows those reporting to disclose a dollar range, not an exact amount; the act also explicitly affirms officials aren’t exempt from insider-trading laws. Prior to 2012 and the introduction of this disclosure requirement, it wasn’t fully clear those laws applied to Congress at all.

In practice, it means that all trades must be disclosed publicly, but the public may learn about the trade more than a month after it happens.

To be clear, the Trump Organization has said the president’s accounts are managed independently and without his input.

Must Read

Join 19,000+ readers and get Money.ca’s best stories and exclusive interviews first — clear insights curated and delivered weekly. Subscribe now.

How Canada does this differently

Canadian federal politicians work under a stricter framework.

Under the Conflict of Interest Act, cabinet ministers and the prime minister are generally required to either divest controlled assets like individual stocks or place them in a blind trust within 120 days of taking office, with a trustee who cannot consult the office-holder about day-to-day decisions. Prime Minister Mark Carney, for example, moved his holdings into a blind trust before the legal deadline required it.

Advertisement

None of this means Canadian politics is free of conflict-of-interest controversy — it means the mechanism is different: Canada leans on divestment before the fact, while the U.S. leans on disclosure after the fact.

What this means for Canadian investors

The practical lesson for Canadian retail investors has less to do with any one politician and more to do with information timing generally.

By the time any market-moving news is public — a trial result, a policy change, a disclosed trade — the earliest movers, whether that’s corporate insiders, institutional funds, or officials filing a delayed disclosure report, have already acted. A retail investor reading the headline is, structurally, always near the back of the line.

That argues for caution rather than speed. A single biotech stock that just moved 177% in a day is a concentrated, high-volatility bet, not a core holding, and buying because of a headline about someone else’s gains doesn’t restore any lost edge.

Canadians who want exposure to the broader promise of mRNA and oncology research can consider diversified health care sector funds instead of chasing one name after its best day.

The headline here is a 225% gain. The more durable story is a legal gap that lets it happen the way it did — and a reminder that, gap or no gap, the public is never the first to know. For smart investors, that means creating an investment plan and sticking to it regardless of market swings.

You May Also Like

The most expensive financial mistakes are often the ones you don't see coming. Join 19,000+ Canadians who get the money moves, risks and opportunities shaping their finances — delivered free each week. Subscribe now.

Share this:
Romana King Senior Editor

Romana King, Senior Editor at Money.ca, also writes for various North American publications and the RKHomeowner blog. Her book, House Poor No More, is an Amazon bestseller and five-time award winner, including the 2022 New York CPA Society's Excellence in Financial Journalism (EFJ) Book Award.

more from Romana King

Explore the latest

Disclaimer

The content provided on Money.ca is information to help users become financially literate. It is neither tax nor legal advice, is not intended to be relied upon as a forecast, research or investment advice, and is not a recommendation, offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities enter into any loan, mortgage or insurance agreements or to adopt any investment strategy. Tax, investment and all other decisions should be made, as appropriate, only with guidance from a qualified professional. We make no representation or warranty of any kind, either express or implied, with respect to the data provided, the timeliness thereof, the results to be obtained by the use thereof or any other matter. Advertisers are not responsible for the content of this site, including any editorials or reviews that may appear on this site. For complete and current information on any advertiser product, please visit their website.

†Terms and Conditions apply.